Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Meters, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Meters, Velez Garcia-Nieto An excellent, Isla-Tejera B
3 months) amongst the history research time and complete guide time. With this recommendations, publications should think about requesting article writers of SRs to help you change their literary works research until the desired of your SRs. SR users also needs to ascertain the amount of time lag between the past look time of critiques to ensure that the evidence is up-to-big date having productive scientific choice-to make.
Sources
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz Grams: Logical evaluations in the health care a functional book. When you look at the. Cambridge: Cambridge College or university Press,; 2001: step 1 online money (148 p.).
Chalmers Look At This I. Chapter 24: having fun with scientific studies and documents from lingering products to possess medical and you will moral trial design, monitoring, and you may reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, writers. Systematic evaluations inside healthcare : meta-studies inside the perspective. 2nd ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj, Jones DR. Evidence synthesis while the key to a great deal more defined and you may productive research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:30.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Is scientific critiques upwards-to-day at the time of publication? Syst Rev. 2013;2:thirty-six.
Palese An excellent, Coletti S, Dante A great. Book efficiency among highest impact basis medical journals in 2009: good retrospective investigation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi M, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most of systematic product reviews composed inside the higher-perception magazines failed to check in the fresh standards: an excellent meta-epidemiological investigation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;60.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Meters, Elo S, Kyngas H. The fresh new methodological quality of health-related reviews blogged for the higher-impression nursing guides: a glance at the fresh new books. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Practise devices from inside the proof situated practice: comparison regarding recyclable studying things (RLOs) getting learning about meta-studies. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Bj, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR try a professional and you will valid aspect equipment to evaluate new methodological quality of logical product reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Meters, Vallve Odena M, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic A great, Jeric Meters, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Meters, Poklepovic Pericic T, mais aussi al. Methodological and you can reporting top-notch medical feedback typed regarding high ranks journals in neuro-scientific serious pain. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The caliber of health-related critiques at your fingertips surgery: an analysis using AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Va, Sharif MO. An enthusiastic AMSTAR review of methodological top-notch clinical feedback regarding dental healthcare interventions had written throughout the journal out of used dental science (JAOS). J Appl Dental Sci. 2011;19(5):440eight.
Logical product reviews and meta-analyses for the psoriasis: character of funding supplies, disagreement of interest and you may bibliometric indices because predictors away from methodological quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):1633forty two.
Brandt JS, Downing Ac, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Solution classics into the obstetrics and gynecology: brand new 100 usually cited log posts over the past 50 decades. Are J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1eight.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di M, Tam WW, Tang J. Distribution and you may epidemiological features out-of wrote individual diligent investigation meta-analyses. PLoS One to. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Acceptance out-of PRISMA report and you may top-notch logical recommendations and you will meta-analyses wrote when you look at the medical journals: a mix-sectional studies. BMJ Discover. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Cock sucking, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Meters, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A good, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Outside recognition of a dimension product to evaluate scientific feedback (AMSTAR). PLoS You to definitely. 2007;2(12):e1350.
Be the first to comment